BlackHartBlackHart
Scores/Wormhole/Provenance/Cross-Chain Messaging
D10

Cross-Chain Messaging

Conditional: bridge trust model, sequencer risk, fraud proof maturity, cross-chain replay risk.

Weight conditional65% confidence
62
Moderate
info

How This Score Is Built

Conditional: bridge trust model, sequencer risk, fraud proof maturity, cross-chain replay risk.

+23Strong positive
+12Positive
+5Slight positive
−15Strong negative
−8Negative
−3Slight negative

Scoring Tree

BRI Formula
300 + 700 × ∏(Dᵢ/100)^wᵢ
791
Current BRI
D10Cross-Chain Messaging
Weight 9%
62
(62/100)^0.09 = 0.9579
Contributing Factors
+16$320M bridge exploit is defining cross-chain risk event
+16Guardian key compromise class is bridge-specific
+16Message verification trust model across heterogeneous chains
+16Rate limiting added as defense-in-depth post-exploit
Evidence Sources
blackhart_hacks_feedApr 18View
blackhart_analysisMay 4sha256:57285dd6b572....
blackhart_analysisMay 17sha256:0c1a3cebfb3a....View

Score Composition

+16

$320M bridge exploit is defining cross-chain risk event

+16

Guardian key compromise class is bridge-specific

+16

Message verification trust model across heterogeneous chains

+16

Rate limiting added as defense-in-depth post-exploit

Positive

Evidence Chain (3 files)

GitHub APIMay 17, 2026, 06:58 PM
open_in_newGitHub (/)
sha256:0c1a3cebfb3a...
BlackHart AnalysisMay 4, 2026, 06:00 PM
sha256:57285dd6b572...
hack_forensicsApr 18, 2026, 12:00 AM
open_in_newPrecedent: Kelp DAO exploit (analogous)
exploit type: bridge_exploit
loss usd: 292000000
relation: analogous
match: Cross-chain bridge exploit resulting in unauthorized token minting on destination chain, though Wormhole was a smart contract vulnerability rather than infrastr

Score History

No dimension-level score changes recorded yet.

Methodology: 2.1Formula: 1.1Weights: 1.1