BlackHartBlackHart

Two fresh wallets own 93 percent of the 'Ukraine retakes Crimea' market, both betting no

Two addresses, each holding about 46 percent on NO, control almost the entire $613,000 market. Both were created days before they bet.

BRI-PM risk score
519CASTNear-total two-wallet control
Full risk profile →
40
Information Fairness
5
Trade Integrity
50
Resolution Trust
30
Event Exposure
95
Question Clarity
86
Venue Health

There are 337 wallets in the market on whether Ukraine will recapture Crimea by June 30. Two of them are, for any practical purpose, the entire market.

On-chain analysis

The two largest wallets hold 46.5 and 46.2 percent of all volume here, about $285,000 each, both on NO, that Ukraine will not retake Crimea by the deadline. Together they are 92.7 percent of the market.

Both wallets were created within two days of their first trade. A geopolitical market in which two brand-new accounts hold 93 percent of the money, on the same side, is not a forecast. It is two actors setting a number that everyone else reads as the odds.

We make no claim about who they are, or whether they coordinated beyond what the chain shows: same side, near-equal size, fresh wallets, 93 percent between them. On a market that turns on the course of a war, that concentration is the story.

Wallet network

Deeper layer

Beyond single-wallet metrics: who is actually behind the flow. We group pseudonymous wallets into controlled-entity candidates using observable on-chain signatures, identical trade size, same-day entry, shared side, single-market lifetime.

92.7%
of market volume behind surfaced entities
337
distinct non-system wallets
2
controlled-entity candidates
45%
of top wallets were ≤2 days old at entry
drag nodes · click to inspectThis market0x62fd…139c0xbbab…2b21
Interactive graph

Drag any node to explore. Hover to trace its links. Click a wallet for its validated on-chain pages.

  • This market
  • Dominant wallet
  • Coordinated ring

On-chain trade-signature linkage + wallet-age + both-sides. Realized PnL not asserted (needs CTF decoder).

Dominant NO wallet

High confidence
1 wallet · NO side
46.5%
$285,277
  • a single address holds 46.5% of all market volume
  • 22 trades
Show 1 sample wallet
$285,27746.5%

Dominant NO wallet

High confidence
1 wallet · NO side
46.2%
$283,190
  • a single address holds 46.2% of all market volume
  • 19 trades
Show 1 sample wallet
$283,19046.2%

Coverage & limits: On-chain trade-signature linkage + wallet-age + both-sides. Realized PnL not asserted (needs CTF decoder).

Wallet risk

Cross-market

Each controlling wallet scored across all of its Polymarket activity: ring membership, concentration, wallet freshness, and cross-market footprint, with market-makers down-weighted. Higher is more insider-like.

30
0xbbab…2b21
Dominant position in 1 market; created within 2 days of first entry; active across 1 markets
30
0x62fd…139c
Dominant position in 1 market; created within 2 days of first entry; active across 1 markets

Signals exposed

Top entities control 92.7% of market volume
concentration=92.7%

Wallets that drove the risk

0xbbab…2b21
Dominant position in 1 market; created within 2 days of first entry; active across 1 markets
0x62fd…139c
Dominant position in 1 market; created within 2 days of first entry; active across 1 markets
Catalyst & timing

A hard June 30 deadline on an active war makes the market acutely catalyst-exposed in its final weeks.

Resolution wording

Resolves YES if Ukraine regains control of Crimean territory before July 1, 2026, per credible reporting.

How we measured this

Every figure is read from on-chain Polygon trade logs for this market and from BlackHart's BRI-PM v0.2 scorer. Polymarket system contracts are excluded from every wallet figure. Entity and wallet-risk groupings are statistical inferences from observable on-chain signatures.

See this on every market you browse

The BlackHart extension overlays this risk score directly on Polymarket , so you see the signal before you place the trade.